- The Opulent Investor's Journal
- Posts
- EPF vs PPF vs NPS — Which One Secures Your Retirement Best?
EPF vs PPF vs NPS — Which One Secures Your Retirement Best?
Table of Contents
💭 Introduction
Planning for retirement can be tricky when every scheme claims to be “the safest” or “the smartest.” Among India’s top three—EPF, PPF, and NPS—each serves a unique purpose. Let’s decode which one fits your financial life stage and how combining them can build a stress-free retirement.
1️⃣ Employee Provident Fund (EPF): The Automatic Saver
EPF is a mandatory savings plan for salaried employees. Both employer and employee contribute 12% of basic salary plus DA.
Interest rate: 8.25% (FY 2024–25)
Tax status: Fully exempt under the EEE rule (Exempt-Exempt-Exempt)
Liquidity: Partial withdrawal after 5 years for specific needs
💡 Finogent View: Ideal for disciplined accumulation—automatic, stable, and suited for long-term employees.
2️⃣ Public Provident Fund (PPF): The Safe Long-Term Compounding Tool
PPF suits conservative investors wanting guaranteed, tax-free returns.
Interest rate: 7.1% (fixed quarterly)
Lock-in: 15 years (extendable in 5-year blocks)
Tax benefit: Up to ₹1.5 lakh under Section 80C; interest and maturity fully tax-free
💡 Finogent Tip: Use PPF as your “stability anchor” alongside market-linked products.
3️⃣ National Pension System (NPS): The Growth Engine
NPS is a voluntary, market-linked plan regulated by PFRDA, allowing exposure to equity, corporate bonds, and government securities.
Returns: 9–11% long-term average (depending on allocation)
Tax benefit: ₹1.5 lakh under 80C + extra ₹50,000 under 80CCD(1B)
Withdrawal: 60% corpus tax-free at 60; 40% invested in annuity
💡 Finogent View: Suitable for investors comfortable with moderate risk and seeking higher growth potential.
4️⃣ Comparing the Trio — Snapshot View
Feature | EPF | PPF | NPS |
|---|---|---|---|
Type | Mandatory (salaried) | Voluntary (anyone) | Voluntary (market-linked) |
Interest/Return | 8.25% | 7.1% | 9–11% (equity exposure) |
Tax Benefit | 80C (₹1.5L) | 80C (₹1.5L) | 80C + 80CCD(1B) |
Liquidity | Partial after 5 yrs | Loan & partial after 7 yrs | Partial (25%) after 3 yrs |
Lock-In | Till retirement | 15 years | Till age 60 |
Risk | Low | Low | Moderate–High |
Best For | Salaried, risk-averse | Self-employed, conservative | Growth-focused investors |
5️⃣ How to Combine Them for Maximum Impact
Young professionals: Focus on EPF + NPS (for long-term compounding)
Self-employed: Build core with PPF + NPS
Late starters (40+): Max PPF for tax-free stability; use NPS for growth buffer
HNIs: Diversify beyond these schemes into hybrid or AIF structures for tax optimisation
💡 Finogent Insight
No single plan wins the retirement race. EPF gives stability, PPF gives safety, and NPS gives scalability. The best strategy is a blend aligned to your income type, retirement horizon, and tax slab.
CTA: Let Finogent help you create the right mix of EPF, PPF, and NPS — customised for your lifestyle and goals.
Reply